Table Of Contents

Step 3. Link Breakage and Routing Table Updates

Introduction

In the previous steps, we observed how RIP builds routing tables in a stable network. However, one of the key advantages of dynamic routing protocols like RIP is their ability to adapt to network changes. In this step, we’ll explore how RIP responds when a link in the network fails.

When a link fails, routers need to update their routing tables to reflect the new network topology. This process involves detecting the failure, propagating this information to other routers, and recalculating routes to affected destinations. RIP handles this through its regular update mechanism, with some additional features to improve convergence time.

Goals

In this step, our goals are to:

1. Demonstrate how RIP updates routing tables when a link failure occurs

2. Observe the process of route invalidation and removal

3. Understand how routing information propagates through the network after a topology change

4. Introduce the concept of split horizon and its importance in preventing routing loops

Network Configuration

We use the same network topology as in the previous step, but with two important changes:

1. We schedule a link break using the ScenarioManager module

2. We enable split horizon in the RIP configuration

The ScenarioManager allows us to simulate network events, such as link failures, at specific times during the simulation. In this case, we’ll break the link connecting router2 and switch2 at t=50 seconds.

Split horizon is a technique used to prevent routing loops in distance-vector protocols like RIP. With split horizon enabled, a router will not advertise routes back to the neighbor from which it learned them. This helps prevent the “count to infinity” problem, which we’ll explore in more detail in Step 6.

The configuration in omnetpp.ini is the following:

[Config Step3]
description = "Link breakage"
extends = Step2
sim-time-limit = 200s

# Enable split horizon in order for the scenario to work properly
*.router*.rip.ripConfig = xml("<config> \
                                  <interface hosts='router*' mode='SplitHorizon' /> \
                               </config>")
# Disable ping application
*.host0.numApps = 0

*.scenarioManager.script = xml("<scenario> \
                                    <disconnect t='50' src-module='router2' dest-module='switch2' /> \
                                </scenario>")

Note the key changes from Step 2:

• *.router*.rip.ripConfig: Changed from “NoSplitHorizon” to “SplitHorizon” mode

• *.scenarioManager.script: XML script that disconnects the link between router2 and switch2 at t=50s

• *.host0.numApps = 0: Disabled the ping application to focus on routing updates

Understanding Link Failure Detection in RIP

When a link fails, there are two ways RIP can detect and respond to the failure:

1. Physical layer detection: If the router can detect the physical link failure (as in our simulation), it can immediately invalidate routes that use that link.

2. Timeout-based detection: If a router stops receiving updates for a route from a neighbor, the timeout timer for that route will eventually expire (default 180 seconds), and the route will be marked as unreachable.

In our simulation, we’re using physical layer detection, which allows for faster convergence after the link failure.

Experiment: Observing Route Updates After Link Failure

In the video below, observe what happens when the link connecting router2 and switch2 breaks at t=50 seconds. The video starts at approximately t=30 seconds, after the routing tables have stabilized from the initial RIP convergence.

When the link fails, the following sequence of events occurs:

1. router2 detects the link failure and immediately invalidates routes that use that link

2. router2 sends RIP updates to its neighbors, informing them of the route changes

3. The neighbors update their routing tables and propagate the information to their neighbors

4. Eventually, all routers update their routing tables to reflect the new network topology

Notice that some blue arrows (routes to host6) disappear after the link failure, as these routes are no longer valid. However, the network still maintains connectivity to host6 through alternative paths.

Understanding Route Persistence

You may notice that the blue arrow from host6 remains even after the link failure. This is because it represents a static route, not a RIP-managed route. RIP only controls routes between routers, while host routes are statically configured by the Ipv4NetworkConfigurator.

The configurator sets up default routes for hosts to reach their local routers, and these routes remain unchanged regardless of RIP updates. This is a common practice in real networks as well, where end hosts typically have a single default route to their gateway router, and it’s the routers’ responsibility to find the best path to destinations.

The Role of Split Horizon

In this step, we enabled split horizon to ensure reliable convergence after the link failure. Split horizon prevents a router from advertising routes back to the neighbor from which it learned them. This is crucial when dealing with network changes, as it helps prevent routing loops that could otherwise occur during convergence.

For example, after the link between router2 and switch2 breaks:

1. Without split horizon, router1 might advertise a route to host6 back to router2

2. router2 might accept this route and start using it, creating a potential loop

3. With split horizon, router1 will not advertise routes learned from router2 back to router2

We’ll explore the importance of split horizon in more detail in Step 6 when we discuss the “count to infinity” problem.

Conclusion and Next Steps

In this step, we’ve observed how RIP responds to a link failure by updating routing tables and propagating this information through the network. We’ve seen that RIP can adapt to topology changes, though the convergence process takes some time as routing updates propagate through the network.

In the next step, we’ll explore the role of RIP timers in managing route aging and removal, which is another important aspect of how RIP handles network changes.

Sources: omnetpp.ini, RipNetworkA.ned

Discussion

Use this page in the GitHub issue tracker for commenting on this tutorial.

Table Of Contents

• Step 3. Link Breakage and Routing Table Updates
  • Introduction
  • Goals
  • Network Configuration
  • Understanding Link Failure Detection in RIP
  • Experiment: Observing Route Updates After Link Failure
  • Understanding Route Persistence
  • The Role of Split Horizon
  • Conclusion and Next Steps
  • Discussion

Previous

Step 2. Pinging after RIP Convergence

Next

Step 4. RIP Timers: Timeout and Garbage Collection