Table Of Contents

Clock Drift

Goals

In this showcase, we demonstrate the effects of clock drift and time synchronization on network behavior. We show how to introduce local clocks in network nodes, how to configure clock drift for them, and how to use time synchronization mechanisms to reduce time differences.

INET version: 4.4

Source files location: inet/showcases/tsn/timesynchronization/clockdrift

Introduction

In the real world, there is no globally agreed-upon time, but each node uses its own physical clock to keep track of time. Due to finite clock accuracy, clocks in various nodes of the network may diverge over time. The operation of applications and protocols across the network are often very sensitive to the accuracy of this local time.

Simulating Clock Drift and Time Synchronization

By default, modules such as network nodes and interfaces in INET don’t have local time but use the simulation time as a global time. To simulate network nodes with local time, and effects such as clock drift and its mitigation (time synchronization), network nodes need to have clock submodules. To keep time, most clock modules use oscillator submodules. The oscillators produce ticks periodically, and the clock modules count the ticks. Clock drift is caused by inaccurate oscillators. INET provides various oscillator models, so by combining clock and oscillator models, we can simulate constant and random clock drift rates. To model time synchronization, the time of clocks can be set by synchronizer modules.

Several clock models are available:

• OscillatorBasedClock: Has an oscillator submodule; keeps time by counting the oscillator’s ticks. Depending on the oscillator submodule, can model constant and random clock drift rate

• SettableClock: Same as the oscillator-based clock but the time can be set from C++ or a scenario manager script

• IdealClock: The clock’s time is the same as the simulation time; for testing purposes

The following oscillator models are available:

• IdealOscillator: generates ticks periodically with a constant tick length

• ConstantDriftOscillator: generates ticks periodically with a constant drift rate in generation speed; for modeling constant rate clock drift

• RandomDriftOscillator: the oscillator changes drift rate over time; for modeling random clock drift

Synchronizers are implemented as application-layer modules. For clock synchronization, the synchronizer modules need to set the time of clocks, thus only the SettableClock supports synchronization. The following synchronizer modules are available:

• SimpleClockSynchronizer: Uses an out-of-band mechanism to synchronize clocks, instead of a real clock synchronization protocol. Useful for simulations where the details of time synchronization are not important.

• Gptp: Uses the General Precision Time Protocol to synchronize clocks.

The SimpleClockSynchronizer module periodically synchronizes a slave clock to a master clock. The synchronization interval can be configured with a parameter. Also, in order to model real-life synchronization protocols, which are somewhat inaccurate by nature, the accuracy can be specified (see the NED documentation of the module for more details).

The General Precision Time Protocol (gPTP, or IEEE 802.1 AS) can synchronize clocks in an Ethernet network with a high clock accuracy required by TSN protocols. It is implemented in INET by the Gptp module. Several network node types, such as EthernetSwitch have optional gPTP modules, activated by the hasGptp boolean parameter. It can also be inserted into hosts as one of the applications. Gptp is demonstrated in the last example of this showcase. For more details about Gptp, check out the Using gPTP showcase (release pending) or the module’s NED documentation.

The Model and Results

The showcase contains four example simulations. All simulations use the following network:

The example configurations are the following:

• NoClockDrift: Network nodes don’t have clocks, they are synchronized by simulation time

• ConstantClockDriftRate: Network nodes have clocks with constant clock drift rate, and the clocks diverge over time

• OutOfBandSynchronization: Clocks have a constant drift rate, and they are synchronized by an out-of-band synchronization method (without a real protocol)

• GptpSynchronization: Clocks have random constant clock drift, and they are synchronized by gPTP

In the General configuration, source1 is configured to send UDP packets to sink1, and source2 to sink2.

Note

To demonstrate the effects of drifting clocks on the network traffic, we configure the Ethernet MAC layer in switch1 to alternate between forwarding frames from source1 and source2 every 10 us, by using a TSN gating mechamism in switch1. This does not affect the simulation results in the next few sections but becomes important in the Effects of Clock Drift on End-to-end Delay section. More details about this part of the configuration are provided there.

In the next few sections, we present the above four examples. In the simulations featuring clock drift, switch1 always has the same clock drift rate. In the ones also featuring clock synchronization, the hosts are synchronized to the time of switch1. We plot the time difference of clocks and simulation time to see how the clocks diverge from the simulation time and each other.

Example: No Clock Drift

In this configuration, network nodes don’t have clocks. Applications and gate schedules are synchronized by simulation time. (End-to-end delays in the other three cases will be compared to this baseline configuration.)

There are no clocks, so the configuration is empty:

[Config NoClockDrift]
description = "Without clocks, network nodes are synchronized by simulation time"

Example: Constant Clock Drift Rate

In this configuration, all network nodes have a clock with a constant drift rate. Clocks drift away from each other over time.

Here is the configuration:

[Config ConstantClockDriftRate]
description = "Clocks with constant drift rate diverge over time"

*.source*.clock.typename = "OscillatorBasedClock"
*.source*.clock.oscillator.typename = "ConstantDriftOscillator"
*.source1.clock.oscillator.driftRate = 500ppm
*.source2.clock.oscillator.driftRate = -400ppm
*.source*.app[0].source.clockModule = "^.^.clock"

*.switch1.clock.typename = "OscillatorBasedClock"
*.switch1.clock.oscillator.typename = "ConstantDriftOscillator"
*.switch1.clock.oscillator.driftRate = 300ppm
*.switch1.eth[0].macLayer.queue.gate[*].clockModule = "^.^.^.^.clock"

We configure the network nodes to have OscillatorBasedClock modules, with a ConstantDriftOscillator. We also set the drift rate of the oscillators. By setting different drift rates for the different clocks, we can control how they diverge over time. Note that the drift rate is defined as compared to simulation time. Also, we need to explicitly tell the relevant modules (here, the UDP apps and switch1’s queue) to use the clock module in the host, otherwise they would use the global simulation time by default.

Here are the drifts (time differences) over time:

The three clocks have different drift rates. The magnitude and direction of drift of source1 and source2

compared to switch1 are different as well, i.e. source1’s clock is early and source2’s clock is late compared to switch1’s.

Example: Out-of-Band Synchronization of Clocks

In this configuration, the network node clocks have the same constant drift rate as in the previous one, but they are periodically synchronized by an out-of-band mechanism (C++ function call).

Here is the configuration:

[Config OutOfBandSynchronization]
description = "Clocks are periodically synchronized out-of-band, without a real protocol"
extends = ConstantClockDriftRate

*.source*.clock.typename = "SettableClock"
*.source*.clock.defaultOverdueClockEventHandlingMode = "execute"

*.source*.numApps = 2
*.source*.app[1].typename = "SimpleClockSynchronizer"
*.source*.app[1].masterClockModule = "^.^.switch1.clock"
*.source*.app[1].slaveClockModule = "^.clock"
*.source*.app[1].synchronizationInterval = 500us
*.source*.app[1].synchronizationAccuracy = uniform(-10ns, 10ns)

To get the constant clock drift rate, this configuration extends ConstantClockDriftRate. Since we want to use clock synchronization, we need to be able to set the clocks, so network nodes have SettableClock modules. The defaultOverdueClockEventHandlingMode = "execute" setting means that when setting the clock forward, events that become overdue are done immediatelly. We use the SimpleClockSynchronizer to have out-of-band synchronization. This module is implemented as an application, so we add one to each source host. We set the synchronizer modules to sync time to the clock of switch1.

Here are the time differences:

The clock of switch1 has a constant drift rate compared to simulation time. The other clocks diverge from the simulation time with some constant rate but are periodically synchronized to the clock of switch1.

Example: Synchronizing Clocks Using gPTP

In this configuration, the clocks in network nodes have the same drift rates as in the previous two configurations, but they are periodically synchronized to a master clock using the Generic Precision Time Protocol (gPTP). The time synchronization protocol measures the delay of individual links and disseminates the clock time of the master clock on the network through a spanning tree.

Here is the configuration:

[Config GptpSynchronization]
description = "Clocks are periodically synchronized using gPTP"
extends = ConstantClockDriftRate

*.switch*.hasGptp = true

*.switch*.gptp.syncInterval = 500us
*.switch*.gptp.pdelayInterval = 1ms
*.switch*.gptp.pdelayInitialOffset = 0ms

*.switch*.clock.typename = "SettableClock"

*.switch1.gptp.gptpNodeType = "MASTER_NODE"
*.switch1.gptp.masterPorts = ["eth0", "eth1", "eth2"]  # eth*

*.switch2.gptp.gptpNodeType = "SLAVE_NODE"
*.switch2.gptp.slavePort = "eth0"

*.source*.clock.typename = "SettableClock"

*.source1.app[0].source.initialProductionOffset = 20us
*.source2.app[0].source.initialProductionOffset = 30us

*.source*.numApps = 2
*.source*.app[1].typename = "Gptp"
*.source*.app[1].gptpNodeType = "SLAVE_NODE"
*.source*.app[1].slavePort = "eth0"
*.source*.app[1].syncInterval = 500us
*.source*.app[1].pdelayInterval = 1ms

Here are the time differences:

Similarly to the previous example, switch1’s clock has a constant drift, and the other clocks periodically synchronize to switch1.

Accuracy of Synchronization

The precision of the synchronization methods in the OutOfBandSynchronization and GptpSynchronization cases can be visualized by zooming in on the above clock time charts. We can examine the moment when the times of the source hosts change. The distance of the new time from the reference shows the precision:

We configured an arbitrary random accuracy in a range for the SimpleClockSynchronizer. In the case of gPTP, the accuracy is not settable but an emergent property of the protocol’s operation.

Note

• When configuring the SimpleClockSynchronizer with a accuracy of 0, the synchronized time perfectly matches the reference.

• The accuracy might different for all sawteeth.

Effects of Clock Drift on End-to-end Delay

This section aims to demonstrate that clock drift can have profound effects on the operation of the network. We take a look at the end-to-end delay in the four examples to show this effect.

To this end, in all simulations, the Ethernet MAC layer in switch1 is configured to alternate forwarding packets from source1 and source2 every 10 us; note that the UDP applications are sending packets every 20 us, with packets from source2 offset by 10 us compared to source1. Thus packets from both sources have a send window in switch1, and the sources generate and send packets to switch1 in sync with that send window (they are only in sync if the clocks in the nodes are in sync, as we’ll see later).

Here is how we configure this. We configure the EthernetMacLayer in switch1 to contain a GatingPriorityQueue, with two inner queues:

*.switch1.eth[0].macLayer.queue.typename = "GatingPriorityQueue"
*.switch1.eth[0].macLayer.queue.numQueues = 2

The inner queues in the GatingPriorityQueue each have their own gate. The gates connect to a PriorityScheduler, so the gating piority queue prioritizes packets from the first inner queue. Here is a gating priority queue with two inner queues:

In our case, we configure the classifier (set to ContentBasedClassifier) to send packets from source1 to the first queue and those from source2 to the second, thus the gating priority queue prioritizes packets from source1. The gates are configured to open and close every 10us, with the second gate offset by a 10us period (so they alternate being open). Here is the rest of the gating priority queue configuration:

*.switch1.eth[0].macLayer.queue.classifier.typename = "ContentBasedClassifier"
*.switch1.eth[0].macLayer.queue.classifier.packetFilters = ["source1*", "source2*"]
*.switch1.eth[0].macLayer.queue.queue[*].typename = "DropTailQueue"
*.switch1.eth[0].macLayer.queue.gate[*].initiallyOpen = false
*.switch1.eth[0].macLayer.queue.gate[*].durations = [10us, 10us]
*.switch1.eth[0].macLayer.queue.gate[1].offset = 10us

We measure the end-to-end delay of packets from source1 in sink1 and so on. Here are the results for the four examples:

The delay is constant when there is no clock drift (NoClockdrift), or when the clocks are synchronized (OutOfBandSynchronization and GptpSynchronization). In these cases, the applications send packets in sync with the opening of the gates in the queue in switch1. In the no clock drift case, the delay depends only on the bitrate and packet length. In the case of OutOfBandSynchronization and GptpSynchronization, the clocks drift but the drift is periodically eliminated by synchronization, so the delay remains constant. In the constant clock drift case, however, the delay keeps changing substantially compared to the other cases.

What’s the reason behind these graphs? When there is no clock drift (or it is eliminated by synchronization), the end-to-end delay is constant, because the packets are generated in the sources in sync with the opening of the corresponding gates in switch1 (the send windows). In the constant clock drift case, the delay’s characteristics depend on the magnitude and direction of the drift between the clocks.

It might be helpful to think of the constant drift rate as time dilation. In ideal conditions (no clock drift or eliminated clock drift), the clocks in all three modules keep the same time, so there is no time dilation. The packets in both sources are generated in sync with the send windows (when the corresponding gate is open), and they are forwarded immediately by switch1. In the constant clock drift case, from the point of view of switch1, the clock of source1 is slower than its own, and the clock of source2 is faster. Thus, the packet stream from source1 is sparser than in the ideal case, and the packet stream from source2 is denser, due to time dilation.

If the packet stream is sparser (orange graph), there are on average fewer packets to send than the number of send windows in a given amount of time, so packets don’t accumulate in the queue. However, due to the drifting clocks, the packet generation and the send windows are not in sync anymore but keep shifting. Sometimes a packet arrives at the queue in switch1 when the corresponding gate is closed, so it has to wait for the next opening. This next opening happens earlier and earlier for subsequent packets (due to the relative direction of the drift in the two clocks), so packets wait less and less in the queue, hence the decreasing part of the curve. Then the curve becomes horizontal, meaning that the packets arrive when the gate is open and they can be sent immediately. After some time, the gate opening shifts again compared to the packet generation, so the packets arrive just after the gate is closed, and they have to wait for a full cycle in the queue before being sent.

If the packet stream is denser (blue graph), there are more packets to send on average than there are send windows in a given amount of time, so packets eventually accumulate in the queue. This causes the delay to keep increasing indefinitely.

Note

• The packets are not forwarded by switch1 if the transmission wouldn’t finish before the gate closes (a packet takes 6.4us to transmit, the gate is open for 10us).

• The length of the horizontal part of the orange graph is equal to how much the two clocks drift during the time of txWindow - txDuration. In the case of the orange graph, it is (10us - 6.4us) / 700ppm ~= 5ms

Thus, if constant clock drift is not eliminated, the network can no longer guarantee any bounded delay for the packets. The constant clock drift has a predictable repeated pattern, but it still has a huge effect on delay. Unpredictable random clock drift might have an even larger impact.

Sources: omnetpp.ini, ClockDriftShowcase.ned

Discussion

Use this page in the GitHub issue tracker for commenting on this showcase.

Table Of Contents

• Clock Drift
  • Goals
    • Introduction
    • Simulating Clock Drift and Time Synchronization
  • The Model and Results
    • Example: No Clock Drift
    • Example: Constant Clock Drift Rate
    • Example: Out-of-Band Synchronization of Clocks
    • Example: Synchronizing Clocks Using gPTP
    • Accuracy of Synchronization
    • Effects of Clock Drift on End-to-end Delay
  • Discussion

Previous

Time Synchronization

Next

Using gPTP