Table Of Contents
Table Of Contents

Packet Loss vs. Distance Using Various WiFi Bitrates

Goals

In this showcase we perform a parameter study examining how packet error rate changes as a function of distance in a 802.11g wireless network.

INET version: 4.0
Source files location: inet/showcases/wireless/errorrate

The Model

The network contains two hosts operating in 802.11g ad-hoc mode at 10 mW transmission power. One of the hosts acts as traffic source, the other as traffic sink. We will perform a parameter study with the distance and the bitrate as parameters. The distance will run between 10 and 550 meters, in 2 meter steps. The bitrate will take the ERP modes in 802.11g: 6, 9, 12, 18, 24, 36, 48 and 54 Mbps. This results in about 2100 simulation runs.

To make the model more realistic, we will simulate multipath propagation using the TwoRayGroundReflection path loss model. (There are various path loss models in INET, including FreeSpacePathLoss, RayleighFading, RicianFading, LogNormalShadowing and NakagamiFading). The two ray ground reflection path loss model requires a ground model, which is configured in the physicalEnvironment module to be FlatGround. The heights of the hosts above the ground is set to 1.5 meters. We assume isotropic background noise of -86 dBm (IsotropicScalarBackgroundNoise.)

We will use Ieee80211NistErrorModel to compute bit errors. The Ieee80211NistErrorModel is based on the Nist error rate model.

In each simulation run, the source host will send a single UDP packet (56 bytes of UDP data, resulting in a 120-byte frame) to the destination host as a probe. At packet reception, the error model will compute bit error rate (BER) from the signal-to-noise-plus-interference-ratio (SNIR). Packet error rate (PER) will be computed from BER. The simulation records SNIR, BER, and PER. Note that in this simulation model, the physical layer simulation is entirely deterministic, hence there is no need for Monte Carlo.

We lower the snirThreshold parameter of the hosts’ radios from 4 to 0 dB. When the transmission’s SNIR is below this value, the reception is assumed to be incorrect, and the reception is not simulated. Lowering the level results in more fine-grained data at low SNIR levels.

Results

SNIR, BER and PER are recorded from the simulation runs. SNIR is measured at the receiver, and depends on the power of the noise and the power of the signal. The signal power decreases with distance, so SNIR does as well. SNIR is independent of modulations and coding schemes, so it is the same for all bitrates. This can be seen on the following plot, which displays SNIR against distance.

../../../../_images/SNIR_distance_v2.png

The next plot shows how packet error rate decreases with SNIR. Slower bitrates use simpler modulation like binary phase shift keying, which is more tolerant to noise than more complex modulations used by faster bitrates, hence the difference on the graph between the different bitrates.

The various modulations and coding rates of 802.11g ERP modes are the following:

  • 6 and 9 Mbit/s modes use BPSK, coding rates 1/2 and 3/4
  • 12 and 18 Mbit/s modes use QPSK, coding rates 1/2 and 3/4
  • 24 and 36 Mbit/s modes use 16-QAM, coding rates 1/2 and 3/4
  • 48 and 54 Mbit/s modes use 64-QAM, coding rates 1/2 and 3/4

Note that the completely flat and completely vertical lines on the plot are due to the signal power decreasing below the sensitivity of the receiver.

../../../../_images/PER_SNIR_v3.png

The following plot shows the packet error rate vs distance. Again, slower bitrates show less packet errors as the distance increases because of the simpler modulation.

../../../../_images/PER_distance_v3.png

We also compute the effective bitrate, which is the gross bitrate decreased by packet errors. It is computed with the following formula:

effective bitrate = (1-PER) * nominal bitrate

It is equal to the nominal data bitrate unless it is decreased because of bit errors as the distance increases.

Effective bitrate vs distance is shown on the next plot. Higher bitrates are more sensitive to increases in distance, as the effective bitrate drops rapidly after a critical distance. This critical distance is farther for slower bitrates, and the decrease is not as rapid.

../../../../_images/throughput_distance3.png

802.11 ranges depend on many variables, e.g. transmission power, receiver sensitivity, antenna gains and directionality, and background noise levels. The above ranges correspond to arbitrary values for the variables. In reality ranges can vary significantly.

Conclusion

Packet error rate increases quickly as the distance approaches the critical point. Slower bitrates are less sensitive to increasing distance, because they use simpler modulation. Faster bitrate modes are advantageous in short distances because of the increased throughput, but slower modes work better at longer distances. Furthermore, using rate adaptation, a host can use fast modes for short distances and slower modes for larger ones. When the number of lost packets increases and throughput drops, it becomes more viable to change to a slower bitrate mode. For example, the rate control algorithm could change to the slower bitrate at around the critical point, about where the curves for two adjacent bitrate modes intersect.

Discussion

Use this page in the GitHub issue tracker for commenting on this showcase.